Film Critique Forum, yetAnotherFCW Forum Register
yetanotherfcw.partnership:
yetanotherfcw.commerce:

yet Another Film Critique Website Forum Forum Index -> Film(Movie) Directors

M. Night Shyamalan
Goto page 1, 2  Next
  Author    Thread Post new topic Reply to topic
Jeeper



Joined: 20 May 2006
Posts: 9
Location: Jacksonville, FL
M. Night Shyamalan

Is M Night Shyamalan the best new directory? His movies scare the living crap out of me. He doesn't do slasher or shoot em up type of movies. He screws with your head psychologically like they used to do in the 60s.
_________________
Truck Forums
http://www.truckforums.net

Post Mon Jun 19, 2006 1:36 am 
   Reply with quote  
cinemaKid



Joined: 22 Mar 2005
Posts: 1819

I wouldn't call him a new director. Although he's relatively young, he made quite a few movies already. He already made movies that people will be talking about for some time, though I wouldn't call them modern classics. He has a lot of potential, and I really hope that he will focus on creativity rather than profitability like some other established directors *** cough *** Steven Spielberg *** cough ***.
_________________
Online Art Education : Online Degrees : Biographies

Post Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:16 am 
   Reply with quote  
ghostman



Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 482
Location: The area of your back you can't reach.

quote:
Originally posted by cinemaKid:
I wouldn't call him a new director. Although he's relatively young, he made quite a few movies already. He already made movies that people will be talking about for some time, though I wouldn't call them modern classics. He has a lot of potential, and I really hope that he will focus on creativity rather than profitability like some other established directors *** cough *** Steven Spielberg *** cough ***.


Difference with Spielberg is that he's prolific. Even if he directs a commercial popcorn film, he compensates rather quickly. Shamalan does not do this. He takes years to come up with something that fails to live up to the original. He's a one hit wonder so far.

His new film looks like another Signs/Village typa deal that appeals to the commercial audience. Shame...
_________________

Post Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:20 am 
   Reply with quote  
cinemaKid



Joined: 22 Mar 2005
Posts: 1819

quote:
Originally posted by ghostman:

Difference with Spielberg is that he's prolific. Even if he directs a commercial popcorn film, he compensates rather quickly. Shamalan does not do this. He takes years to come up with something that fails to live up to the original. He's a one hit wonder so far.

I think it's a bit too quick to call him a one hit wonder. If he were 60 years old and had not made anything interesting for 20 years, then I would call him that, but he's relatively young still.
_________________
Online Art Education : Online Degrees : Biographies

Post Mon Jun 19, 2006 4:04 am 
   Reply with quote  
ghostman



Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 482
Location: The area of your back you can't reach.

quote:
Originally posted by cinemaKid:
quote:
Originally posted by ghostman:

Difference with Spielberg is that he's prolific. Even if he directs a commercial popcorn film, he compensates rather quickly. Shamalan does not do this. He takes years to come up with something that fails to live up to the original. He's a one hit wonder so far.

I think it's a bit too quick to call him a one hit wonder. If he were 60 years old and had not made anything interesting for 20 years, then I would call him that, but he's relatively young still.


Emphasis on "so far."

Besides, he's made three films since the original Sixth Sense. Musicians are called "one hit wonders" for tanking the second record.

Not to mention 90% of directors do their best work in their youth. That's when they're still fresh and hungry. After several years, their creativity and zest begins wearing off.
_________________

Post Mon Jun 19, 2006 6:50 am 
   Reply with quote  
cinemaKid



Joined: 22 Mar 2005
Posts: 1819

quote:
Originally posted by ghostman:

Not to mention 90% of directors do their best work in their youth. That's when they're still fresh and hungry. After several years, their creativity and zest begins wearing off.

Rear Window - Hitchcock was 44, or 45 when he made this.
Cidade de Deus - Fernando Meirelles, one of co-directors was 47 when he made this.
The Shining - Stanley Kubrick was 52 when he made this.
The Silence of the Lambs - Jonathan Demme was 47 when he made this.
Der Untergang (The Downfall) - Oliver Hirschbiegel was 45 when he made this.
Chinatown - Roman Polanski was 41 when he made this.
Hayao Miyazaki is over 60, but he continues to make great films.

M. Night Shyamalan has not reached 40 yet ...
_________________
Online Art Education : Online Degrees : Biographies

Post Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:38 am 
   Reply with quote  
Moelman



Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 178
Location: Sexyville.

I have liked some of his movies and some I have felt were let-downs. I hope in the future he continues to become a better director.
_________________
Insane Entertainment - where your dreams come true.

Post Mon Jun 19, 2006 1:34 pm 
   Reply with quote  
ghostman



Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 482
Location: The area of your back you can't reach.

quote:
Originally posted by cinemaKid:
quote:
Originally posted by ghostman:

Not to mention 90% of directors do their best work in their youth. That's when they're still fresh and hungry. After several years, their creativity and zest begins wearing off.

Rear Window - Hitchcock was 44, or 45 when he made this.
Cidade de Deus - Fernando Meirelles, one of co-directors was 47 when he made this.
The Shining - Stanley Kubrick was 52 when he made this.
The Silence of the Lambs - Jonathan Demme was 47 when he made this.
Der Untergang (The Downfall) - Oliver Hirschbiegel was 45 when he made this.
Chinatown - Roman Polanski was 41 when he made this.
Hayao Miyazaki is over 60, but he continues to make great films.

M. Night Shyamalan has not reached 40 yet ...


Well, I'll give you Hayao Miyazaki and Stanley Kubrick, although these guys are legends for their consistency, something Shamalan lacks.

Hitchcock was very prolific and all his works are hailed.

However what I really meant to say was that writers/directors (emphasis on writers) produce their best work in their early years.

Quentin Tarantino - Pulp Fiction
Michael Mann - Heat
George Lucas - Star Wars
Spike Lee - Do The Right Thing
John Carpenter - Halloween
Wes Craven - Nightmare, Scream
Sam Raimi - Evil Dead Trilogy
_________________

Post Tue Jun 20, 2006 12:04 am 
   Reply with quote  
badwolf



Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 10

For me he is still riding on the crest of the wave started by the Sixth Sense. This was a movie that we were all urged to see because of the 'Twist' at the end (which for me was blatantly obvious from the word go, although possibly because I knew there was going to be a twist even before I stepped into the cinema so I was looking it for it). I think this was a good movie, as was Unbreakable, but IMO, Signs and The Village were very disappointing. I'd be interested to hear from people who've seen Lady in the Water - any good?
_________________
Cheap DVDs

Post Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:01 am 
   Reply with quote  
pfgannon



Joined: 26 May 2006
Posts: 46

While I don't think he's been making the best movies recently, they are all still pretty damn good. I actually really liked both Signs and The Village. Of course they aren't nearly as good as 6th Sense
_________________
Music Forum

Post Sun Aug 06, 2006 1:50 pm 
   Reply with quote  
faisj



Joined: 05 Nov 2006
Posts: 17

quote:
Originally posted by badwolf:
For me he is still riding on the crest of the wave started by the Sixth Sense. This was a movie that we were all urged to see because of the 'Twist' at the end (which for me was blatantly obvious from the word go, although possibly because I knew there was going to be a twist even before I stepped into the cinema so I was looking it for it). I think this was a good movie, as was Unbreakable, but IMO, Signs and The Village were very disappointing. I'd be interested to hear from people who've seen Lady in the Water - any good?


Same opinion here...
He runs to much on his:
"play the movie and lets put one special story line
in the movie that will suprise the guest"

But thats it... what i watched the movie "The Village" I already knew all was not real and
it did not schock me at all...
also i would never buy his dvd as /// once the clue
is known the movie aint that great anymore

Post Sun Nov 05, 2006 3:29 pm 
   Reply with quote  
Lpspider



Joined: 20 Jul 2007
Posts: 63

I loved the Sixth Sense, Signs and The villiage. however, Lady in the Watere was horrible.
_________________
Terminator: Sarah Connor Chronicles | T:SCC Forum | Daily Movie Reviews

Post Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:58 am 
   Reply with quote  
Trash



Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Posts: 30

I saw The Apartment or whatever the hell that movie is called earlier.

After viewing it, it's safe to say he is a hack. 100%.
_________________
www.fuelthescene.com <-- the best forum on the internet. ever.

Post Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:53 pm 
   Reply with quote  
DigitalMusings



Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 37

I have found his movies to be quite different than the usual and thats why I like em. Unbreakable was very good concept, although it didnt do that great!
_________________
[url]http://digital-musings.com[url/]

Post Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:38 pm 
   Reply with quote  
Walter Sobchack



Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 120

I was swept up in the hype when he first came out (I even like Unbreakable!), but his tedious Hitchcock hack-job shtick is getting old. I find him rather boring and pretentious.
_________________
Hobbit Movie | Sci Fi MMORPG

Post Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:50 pm 
   Reply with quote  
  Display posts from previous:      
Post new topic Reply to topic

Google
 
Web yetanotherfcw.com
forum.yetanotherfcw.com store.yetanotherfcw.com